High Court: Redistricting secret docs can be viewed

Mary Ellen Klas | Miami Herald | 05/28/2014

TALLAHASSEE — The back-and-forth battle over secret redistricting documents ended Tuesday as the Florida Supreme Court ruled 538 pages of emails, maps and planning documents of a GOP political operative must be allowed into the record in the ongoing redistricting trial – but only if the courtroom is closed.

The 5-2 ruling by the state’s high court was a victory for the voters groups who are challenging the congressional maps drawn by the Legislature. The groups also are alleging that a “shadow” redistricting process was conducted by political consultants and operatives in an attempt to unconstitutionally influence the legislature’s drawing of the 2012 maps.

But the ruling also was a triumph for Pat Bainter, and his company Data Targeting, who sought to shield his confidential conversations from the public. Trial court Judge Terry Lewis had ruled that Bainter’s documents could remain confidential unless they were entered as evidence in the trial but the First District Court of Appeal reversed that decision and ordered the documents to remain sealed.

The plaintiffs in the case, led by the League of Women voters, asked the high court for an emergency review of their appeal and argued, in briefs that were kept under seal, that the documents should be opened and allowed in court.

The court noted that the “statewide importance” of the ligitation and the “lack of Florida precedent” regarding the secret documents made it likely that the appellate court would have referred the issue to the high court. But, because the case is ongoing, the justices wanted time to determine whether the documents should be made public. The court ordered Lewis to “maintain the confidentiality of the documents by permitting any disclosure or use only under seal of the court and in a courtroom closed to the public.”

The ruling protects Bainter in the event the documents are deemed “trade secrets,” as his lawyers argue, but it also allows the trial — now in its second week — to continue. The judge has set a strict deadline of next Wednesday for completion of the case.

The First Amendment Foundation and some news organizations are reviewing the ruling to decide whether they will take a position on closing the courtroom in the case.

“This litigation is unique because it impacts the statewide operation of government and the validity of Florida’s current system of government through the alleged unconstitutionality of the 2012 apportionment plan,”' the majority wrote in the opinion signed by Justices Barbara Pariente, Peggy Quince, Jorge Labarga and James E.C. Perry.

Justice R. Fred Lewis concurred with an opinion. Justices Ricky Polston and Charles Canady dissented, each with an opinion.

The decision came even before the appeals court released its written opinion on the ruling it made last Thursday. The DCA ordered the documents sealed but was expected to make its findings and determine the rule of law in a written opinion that has not yet been issued.

Canady blasted that order of events as “truly unprecedented” and chastised the majority as “simply guessing at what the First District’s opinion will state as the basis for its ruling in order to engage in the active trial management.” He also accused the court of unconstitutionally pre-empting the appellate court.

“In short, this Court has predetermined appellate error and awarded the petitioners full relief in the trial court by requiring admission of evidence,” Canady wrote.

The majority noted that the appellate court was likely to have certified a question to the Supreme Court when it releases its expected opinion and their emergency action was “in order to maintain the status quo during the ongoing trial” and to “prevent any irreparable harm that might occur if the Petitioners are prevented from using the challenged documents.”

The ruling will create some challenges for Lewis, who has allowed the trial to be broadcast daily on public broadcasting’s The Florida Channel. Lewis was told of the ruling and the potential for a closed courtroom at the end of the redistricting hearing Tuesday.
“I wasn't about to close it without someone telling me,” he said

Legal battle over state Senate districts coming to an end

TALLAHASSEE - A contentious battle over Florida state senate districts is coming to an end. read more »

Senate won't appeal redistricting ruling

Clearing the way for elections later this year with a map that could boost Democrats' numbers in the Senate, Republican leaders decided Wednesday not to appeal a Leon County judge's ruling setting districts for the chamber's 40 seats. read more »

Florida Senate won't appeal ruling on new districts

TALLAHASSEE — Senate leaders said Wednesday that they will not appeal last month's court ruling that sided with a voters' coalition in setting new district boundaries. read more »

Florida Legislature won't appeal redistricting ruling

TALLAHASSEE — The Florida Legislature is giving up the fight and will not contest a court ruling that redraws all of the state's 40 state senate districts for the 2016 election cycle. read more »

Editorial: Republicans should accept redistricting defeat and drop talk of appeals

For a brief moment last week it appeared the Florida Legislature had come to its senses and was willing to accept a judge's ruling on the boundaries for new state Senate districts. read more »

Renumbering state Senate districts triggers political scramble

TALLAHASSEE — It may sound like a simple process, but the Florida Senate's random renumbering of all its districts statewide Tuesday touched off a series of complicated twists that one key lawmaker said only adds more chaos to a continuing redistricting saga. read more »