Florida House Speaker Weatherford testifies in redistricting trial

Matt Dixon[ck_comma] Scripps/Tribune Capital Bureau | TC Palm | 05/20/2014

TALLAHASSEE — For the first time in Florida history, a sitting House speaker took the witness stand Tuesday to give testimony about state business.

In most cases, so-called “legislative privilege” shields lawmakers from having to go under oath in cases that involve state business. The Florida Supreme Court, though, ruled that legal philosophy doesn’t apply to a redistricting trial that could lead to the state’s congressional districts being redrawn.

The plaintiffs, including the League of Women Voters of Florida, contend the state’s congressional maps are unconstitutional because politics played a role in shaping the districts, contrary to a 2010 “Fair Districts” amendment that was to remove politics from redistricting.

If Leon Circuit Judge Terry Lewis agrees with the plaintiffs, Florida lawmakers would have to redraw the state’s congressional district boundaries.

During his nearly four hours of testimony in a Tallahassee courtroom, House Speaker Will Weatherford, who headed the House’s 2012 redistricting efforts, said politics played no role in the Legislature’s final maps.

“We went to great lengths to depoliticize the process,” testified Weatherford, who said members acted as a “shield” to keep professional staff away from political consultants eager to influence the process.

In at least one case, though, a top House aide was actively funneling nonpublic maps to GOP consultant Marc Reichelderfer.

“I intended to help a friend who was cut out of a process that determines how he makes his living,” said Kirk Pepper, a top aide to then-House Speaker Dean Cannon, R-Winter Park.

Weatherford said Pepper, who testified before Weatherford, showed “poor judgment.”

“Had the speaker known he had done it, had I known he had done it, there would have been serious consequences,” Weatherford said.

Attorneys for the coalition of plaintiffs zeroed in on a meeting that Weatherford had with Senate President Don Gaetz, R-Niceville, who at the time led the Senate’s redistricting process and staff.

Weatherford said they handled the maps as if they were any other piece of legislation when there are differences between the House and Senate. Those are often worked out by staff members, presiding officers or committee chairmen.

“The conversation to determine the differences between the two (maps) was a meeting between the Senate president and I and staff,” he said. “That is in line with our rules and our open records laws.”

The lack of trust and palpable dislike between the House and Senate going into the 2012 session also was on full display during Pepper’s testimony.

“There was essentially zero conversation between the Senate president’s office and the speaker’s office,” Pepper testified during the Tuesday hearing.

That dislike stemmed from a 2011 session that didn’t end until nearly 4 a.m. During that session, Cannon and then-Senate President Mike Haridopolos, R-Merritt Island, openly criticized each other and both chambers voted down the other’s top priorities.

The tension carried over into the 2012 session, which was the year lawmakers had to draw new political districts as part of the once-a-decade redistricting process.

To make sure both sides of the Legislature had some communication, legislative leaders each selected a lobbyist they were close with to act as an intermediary. For the Senate it was Rich Heffley; and on the House side it was Reichelderfer, who gave nearly six hours of testimony on the first day of the trial, which started Monday.

Pepper said he gave maps that weren’t public to Reichelderfer, but never received input from him or any other political consultant. This mirrored testimony given by Reichelderfer, and is a key point. The plaintiffs must prove it was the explicit intent of the Legislature to help Republicans, not just that they had maps early or were involved in the process.

Legal battle over state Senate districts coming to an end

TALLAHASSEE - A contentious battle over Florida state senate districts is coming to an end. read more »

Senate won't appeal redistricting ruling

Clearing the way for elections later this year with a map that could boost Democrats' numbers in the Senate, Republican leaders decided Wednesday not to appeal a Leon County judge's ruling setting districts for the chamber's 40 seats. read more »

Florida Senate won't appeal ruling on new districts

TALLAHASSEE — Senate leaders said Wednesday that they will not appeal last month's court ruling that sided with a voters' coalition in setting new district boundaries. read more »

Florida Legislature won't appeal redistricting ruling

TALLAHASSEE — The Florida Legislature is giving up the fight and will not contest a court ruling that redraws all of the state's 40 state senate districts for the 2016 election cycle. read more »

Editorial: Republicans should accept redistricting defeat and drop talk of appeals

For a brief moment last week it appeared the Florida Legislature had come to its senses and was willing to accept a judge's ruling on the boundaries for new state Senate districts. read more »

Renumbering state Senate districts triggers political scramble

TALLAHASSEE — It may sound like a simple process, but the Florida Senate's random renumbering of all its districts statewide Tuesday touched off a series of complicated twists that one key lawmaker said only adds more chaos to a continuing redistricting saga. read more »